Q2 - The Evolution of Creation
Section 1.
Basic Methodology of Quantum Field Science
Games and Theory
Quantum Field science is a terminology given to a new
type of physical science that completely replaces the current atomic model
allowing the possibility of explaining all actions and functions including
anomalies and chaotic functionality.
Current theories give the user the ability to
mathematically explain the functionality of certain aspects of the known
universe, but fail to anticipate and/or explain seemingly random chaotic
functions that occur. The reason for this is that the base construct that is
currently seen as the foundation of existence is in fact incorrect, in the sense
that function, energy and matter are seen as separate entities that co-exist
rather than being seen as the same “material” viewed from differing
perspectives.
The existence of atoms, protons, neutrons,
electrons and all other hypothetical particles within the physical realm has
never been proven to exist, but still to this day are used as the solid
foundation for all matter and functions throughout the known universe. Aspects
such as environment are limited to the immediate vicinity while
contraindications that occur throughout the intended function are viewed as
“side effects” and/or “random variations” and hence ignored or given the
application of an etheric formula or fabricated function in order to compensate
for the irregularity in the integrity of the progression of the event.
This new model/concept begins at the very core of
simplicity itself, and is an explanation to not only physical matter, but to the
functions, reactions, interactions and complex procedures that occur throughout
nature that range from the simplest physical reaction through to the complexity
of the human biomass. Many of these events throughout our universe are not
explainable, with the use of current concepts, by any one doctrine or
philosophy. Several are usually needed to generate a hypothesis of the action
based purely on postulated supposition and conjecture of the occurrences
surrounding an event from a biased objective view. This statement is not
intended to ridicule the sciences, but allow them to see that the “third
person” perspective based system of analysis is no longer a valid method of
discerning a viable solution nor is it an efficient use of time and resources
when attempting to predetermine an accurate outcome to an event or function.
Many of the current theories surrounding the
physical universe contain exceptions to the rule and have anomalies surrounding
them that contravene their existence. It
is mainly due to the complexity and multitude of these various theorems that
leads to their eventual extinction, but in order to maintain their integrity,
each in turn will be used to support the other in such a fashion as to generate
a circular argument or function that relies upon the existence of proof of
another presumption. Unfortunately,
this only leads to the creation of a hypothetical universe, which is only one
percent effective and useful in the real universe.
Particles and Waves
My knowledge of current theories and methodology is limited to basics of the
philosophy for that is all that should be required from a concept to establish
an individual knowledge base from the first person.
Classic physics denotes that the universe is made up of
particles ranging from atoms and molecules through to quarks and neutrinos.
These particles have physical size and weight, as does a grain of sand on
the beach, implying that the beach is a solid singular object and a grain of
sand is a representation of one of an almost infinite number of molecules that
makes up the entire object. Each
molecule contains the parts, components and three-dimensional pattern that make
up the entire object as a singular mass.
Chemistry can give us the make-up of the object,
but cannot give us the spatial geometry. Physics
can give us reactance to the object from exterior sources, which tells us how
the object interacts with our physical universe, but still cannot give us
certain answers.
Geometry can give us the physical shape and
dimensions but in the end none of the current doctrines can give us the one
single thing that is required to truly understand, which is what the object
actually is.
Waves, on the other hand, can give us the
resultant effect of the object's interaction with its surrounding environment,
which is then discerned as the object's signature.
If an object is interacted with by another object or effect, it will
exhibit and emit a waveform effect that is based on the object's source
signature (that is -- the innate emanation of the compounded vibrations emitting
from the individual components that make up the object) or global MRF (Magnetic
Resonance Frequency) and the waveform pattern used to create the desired
response from the object.
To coin an analogy, if you throw a pebble into a
pond, the resultant waves display the effect of the object on its surroundings.
The closer of these two scientific concepts would
have to be “waves” since the resultant fluctuation of effect generated by
the object is seen as a “magnetic” effect in nature and not considered as
solid mass or matter in respect to what is called solid.
The only step that the wave theory has not taken
is to remove the particle theory from the equation and base the initial
calculations on an existent compound mass as a “wave” based function/event
instead of a particle discerned format that is “seen” to generate waveform
emissions. The angle of thought required to approach this subject is to see the
emitter itself as a function/event that evolves with and conforms to the
restrictions and capabilities of its environment and surroundings. The emitter
itself is an emission as such generated by the action of both its own construct
and that which developed it as an outcome event. (ps…this is not a “chicken
and the egg” theory since the former and later are both a construct of
corporeal fields).
The point that I am attempting to make here is
not to ridicule the doctrines, but to show that the perspective view of a
substance/object/function/event can only show an outcome in reference to the
voyeur. The substance/object/function/event cannot be set a series of guidelines
and parameters based on what the voyeur requires. The
substance/object/function/event has its own parameters in reference to itself
and its surroundings based on what it is, where, when, how and why and also in
which sequence of already existent events it is currently involved in.
Physics of the Field
A "field" is currently described as an emanation of an object of substance
that is the resultant effect of the material of the substance or interaction
with another object of same, similar, or differing compound.
In
short, a field is that which surrounds.
This
is not exactly correct.
A
field, in the Q Mechanics terminology is that which “is”. The substance /
object as it is without any exterior interaction from other sources. That which
makes up the material or the object contains a pattern or signature that
designates what it is, where it is, when, how and why.
A
field or signature of an object is a culmination of many constituents and/or
actions/functions that make it up. These constituents are not physical matter as
we know it, but in fact are the actions/functions that interact with each other
to develop an evolvement of what is considered as physical matter or particle
form. The evolvement is established by the interaction of two or more actions in
an immediate environmental medium. In
any functional equation we have a minimum of 3 constituents to produce an
action.
Three – Four Base Table
The
3-4 base table is a simplistic method of how to explain the action, function and
interaction of the base “elemental” signatures that make up a complex
signature or Global Resonance Signature. This GRS is the representative pattern
format of an actual physical piece of solid matter, which means that it is
actually the physical piece of solid matter and not just a function generated by
its existence within an environment.
In
order to explain this core/base fundamental action (3-4 base table), The labels
of “Alpha”, “Beta” and “Gamma” will be given to the three core
functions. “Alpha” will represent the first action/function, “Beta” will
represent the second and “Gamma” will be the medium/environment.
Mathematical
Extrapolation of the Function of a “Delta” Point or Function
After
the “Delta” evolves, it becomes the “Alpha” or “Beta” of the next
evolutionary function in the chain of events that occur to formulate the pattern
construct of an action / function / object / environment.
The Delta becomes the next Alpha or Beta
This
action/function of the 3-4 is not bound to the linear progression of time even
though time plays an important part in the evolvement of the global event. The
timing of the interactions is based upon the formulated strategy of the
environment verses the constituency of the interactions in relation to the
events that within and surrounding the currently observed event.
Each
Delta event does not necessarily have to become a base function of the next
event. This is what creates an event sequence in that the Delta events that do
not evolve to the next function become signature markers for the progression of
the creation of a “Delta Bar” or singular individual marker aspect of the
GRS.
As can be seen above, the 3 different event sequences look different, but in fact
they are the same event sequence seen from 3 differing perspectives.
The event sequence or Delta sequence is in fact far more detailed and complex than
is shown above, but for explanation purposes, the diagrams will be kept simple
so as to be understood.
The Delta sequence that is shown on the left is a representation of a more complex
and detailed function / event.
The
picture on the right represents a combination of these events or Delta sequences
that is referred to as a MATRIX.
This combination depicts a complete Delta
function, which is the Culmination of all of the individual events giving rise
to Stage 1 of a GRS.
The image on the left is a simplified version of the MATRIX shown as such so as to
allow for the representation of the Delta sequences to be displayed as differing
from each other.
Each
Delta Event Sequence is different in that the size/intensity, position,
rotation, vector angle and direction of focus vary from Delta Point to Delta
Point thus creating a seemingly random and chaotic construct. The randomness of
the sequence is in fact ordered and follows a specific design depending upon the
material or action / function of the final GRS.
The
next stage in the construction is to interact several of these matrices together
so as to generate a larger and more complex signature base. Stage 2 (as seen
below) is the visual representation of the next level of evolvement.
Once
again the apparent randomness of the construct can be seen in the pictures above
and below, but in fact there is a specific pattern evolving that can be
extrapolated from the matrix through to the solid mass. This pattern is the
emergence of what is referenced as a “signature” of the
substance/object/function/event. The individual matrices interact with each
other, not as separate entities as is depicted above, but as an individual mass
that is in a virtual liquid state of both motion and function. Interactions and
evolving functions are not bound to each point but are still bound by the
constraints of the pre-existent evolvement of the delta construct as such.
If
we “zoom out”, it can be seen that the matrix is interacting with itself and
integrating to form a pattern construct. This combination of matrices can be now
identified as a complex pattern that will evolve into a GRS construct.
The
representation of the sphere below is a pictorial representation of a GRS
template of an object / function. All three images below represent differing
visual perspectives of the emission pattern generated by the GRS. This is what a
true “frequency” of a substance or action / function is. The first is a wire
frame that allows you to still see the functions and interactions that form the
GRS. The second shows the silhouette of the GRS while still allowing the
functions to be seen, while the third shows the exterior true representation of
a frequency in its entirety. These three representations are still the same
object/signature but have been shown as such to give you a perspective view of
the signature from differing angles of thought.
  
Below
is a pattern as seen on a 2D imaging system such as a CRO (Cathode Ray
Oscilloscope). This signature/signal of an object/substance/action/function is
an interpolation by a two-dimensional measuring system attempting to measure a
three dimensional situation.
In
order to do this, the device requires a cross-sectional aspect of the GRS in
order to take the measurements of the function. This cross-section is in a 2D
aspect and unfortunately does not give a true representation of the pattern
construct of the material/function.
 
(Addendum Point 1) States of Matter
If the reference of the GRS is taken
into consideration, then the can only be 1 state of matter. Since every event is
constantly in motion and evolving within its own environmental constraints, and
those environments are a function of the outcome of the previous evolvement,
then this can be considered as “fluid” motion as there are no pauses, stops
nor stationary events occurring within the construct.
The commonly referred to “3
states of matter” are simply visual aspects of a fluid function based on
observer’s own function being the reference point for the establishment of the
parameters on which the state is being judged. Solid is still fluid, as is
gaseous. These observations are based on the corporeal existence and function of
the observer and not on the object/function/event itself.
A qualifying example of this is
water. When in its natural environmental state based on its location and
functionality, it is liquid. When heated it vaporizes to steam and when frozen,
it solidifies to ice. As its environment is altered, so is its representative
format in reference to the observer, but it always remains water.
Evolvement 101
From a core GRS, a complex event/function can be
formulated by interacting 2 or more GRS constructs together in an environmental
situation. The equating procedure is identical per evolvement step irrespective
of the size, shape or consistency of the event. This action holds true
throughout all functions. An example would be in order to joint 2 pieces of
steel together, the environment must include a heat component sufficient enough
to destabilize the functionality of the GRS construct of both materials to a
synchronous point where the 2 combine as a fluid.
If the Gamma (Environment) is a common
or synchronous factor to the Alpha and Beta alike, then there will be an
interaction between the two actions/materials based on the event process of the
Gamma function.
1
2
3
4
As can be seen above, the two elements, once interacted
with by an environmental event that was synchronous to particular aspects of the
differing GRS patterns, developed a combined function based of the Alpha, Beta
and Gamma elements in the equation. Since evolvement is continually
unidirectional, the function of “undoing” the event is not to do exactly the
“opposite” function in order to separate the two aspects from each other,
but rather to discern the commonality points of the event sequence that
developed the event and apply a synchronous catalyst and/or function/event
sequence that will evolve the separation of the two substances.
......MORE TO COME
KEEP CHECKING
|
CLICK HERE
